John Sewell Member
|
#6 · Posted: 8 Dec 2004 17:52
At the risk of being drummed out of the International Brotherhood of Tintin Fans, I have to admit, as a kid, I sometimes found Tintin's worthiness and unassailable good-egg nature a little one-note in comparison with Asterix and Obelix, my two other great comic heroes of the time. In terms of characterisation, both the Gauls were often seen to be devious, vain, sulky, and showing just about every point on the emotional scale (such as hysterical laughter or bursting into tears), and in Asterix the Legionary, unrequieted love! On the other hand, Tintin was rarely given to such extreme displays of emotion (except where Chang and Snowy were concerned), and could often seem priggish, such as his disapproval of the Captain's Loch Lomond habit (obviously, at such a young age, I was ignorant of the perils of alcoholism!), and, dare I say it, bland at times.
Before you all ask me why, in that case, I don't clear off to some Asterixologist forum, I don't think that way now! My view now is that one of the great things about Tintin's character is that we really, even after all those decades and albums, don't know much about him as a person; age, background, and so on! That way, generations of children have been able to project their own personalities onto Tintin. Despite what I said above, I was always imagining myself wandering through deserts, learning to speak elephant language or voyaging off in search of treasure! There was something very attractive about the idea of a boy (and I did think of him as a boy, not much older than myself), who was able to travel all over the World and have all those exciting adventures without apparently having any family ties to hold him back!
I've reassessed my view of Tintin's characterisation too, in more, er, mature years - I suppose at the age of six or seven, the more broadly comic characterisations in Asterix were easier to understand! Superficially, there's a world of difference between the imperialist, wildlife-slaughtering Tintin of Congo and the CND-supporting, bloodless revolution organiser of Picaros, but again, the lack of backstory makes it easier to reconcile them into the same person. Overall, he's loyal to his friends and causes (albeit the greater glory of Belgium in the first couple of B&W books!), and tenacious in his investigations, right up to Alph-Art - there's no real reason for him to suspect foul play there, but he keeps plugging away until he uncovers something. The Captain even remarks that Tintin's always seeing mysteries everywhere, and he makes an almost identical comment about his suspicious nature in Picaros. Maybe that suggests that in later years, Herge himself was willing to poke fun, via the Captain, at one of Tintin's few defining characteristics. I also wonder if it was a deliberate ploy on his part not to reveal too much about Tintin, making him a sort of "everyman" for the reasons I mentioned above?
|