Tintin Forums

Tintinologist.org Forums / Curious about Tintin? (Non-album specific) /

Rastapopoulos: Is he Tintin's archenemy?

zgn2
Member
#1 · Posted: 29 Nov 2006 19:59
What do you think? Is Rastapopoulos Tintin's arch-enemy, despite the fact that (I think) he's only in four books?
If he's been in more, please tell me!
Balthazar
Moderator
#2 · Posted: 29 Nov 2006 20:23
Moriarty is usually described as Sherlock Holmes's arch-enemy, and he features in hardly any of those stories. Of course, the story in which Moriarty features most prominently involves him appearing to kill Holmes. So maybe the arch-ness of an enemy is measured in deadliness, rather than frequency.
Ranko
Member
#3 · Posted: 29 Nov 2006 21:15
I'd go along with that statement. I've always thought that Professor Smi... Dr. Muller was the worst of the two. He appears a bit more chilling to me than Roberto.
labrador road 26
Member
#4 · Posted: 29 Nov 2006 22:45
I also think Müller is slightly more homicidal than Rastapopoulos. As I see it, there are three arch-enemies, Rastapopoulos, Müller and Allan Thompson.
Harrock n roll
Moderator
#5 · Posted: 30 Nov 2006 18:25
Third part harmonizing; I also think Dr Müller is the deadliest of the baddies! And if, as Balthazar suggests, deadliness is how you measure an arch-enemy then Müller's ruthlessness and physical ability must put him high in the runnings.

zgn2
(...) despite the fact of being in only four books (if he's been in more, please tell me)?

Well, if you're counting Cigars, Blue Lotus, Red Sea Sharks and Flight 714, that's four.
You could also include Alph-art, although it's open to debate whether Rastapopoulos would have really made the final book (see here).
Also open to debate is whether he appears in America (see this thread).

Of course he also pops up in Lake of Sharks, although the book is usually dismissed pretty quickly on this forum as non-canon!
Jordy
Member
#6 · Posted: 18 Dec 2006 12:29
I agree with Müller being the baddest baddie.
Despite Rastapopoulos's badness, he never came off as nasty and cruel as Müller does.
As for Allan, although he is up there with the other nasties, the worst he's ever done is thrown Tintin in the hold, with the occasional gun fight.
Heck, if he were actually successful in his attempts, half the globe's population would be living their lives out in numerous ship holds with boxes of opium!
lintondrums
Member
#7 · Posted: 7 Jan 2007 19:27
I find that Dr Müller is a very serious, threatening character, where Rastapopoulos is very comical.

The enemies in the books never set out to kill Tintin (except in The Black Island) - it just so happens that Tintin keeps getting in their way!
waveofplague
Member
#8 · Posted: 20 Apr 2007 23:16
If Rastapopoulos is an arch-enemy, is Allan a bit of a "trough"-enemy?

No, I truly think Müller is the one to take most seriously. You can tell a lot about a character by the way Hergé drew them.

Rastapopoulos, while a figure of evil, is also silly and a buffoon (big nose, vacant stare).

Müller is drawn like more of a real-looking human being. Oh, and plus his eyes look very "vacant" to me; it seems they are pupil-less.

Please be sure to familiarize yourself with the Forum Posting Guidelines.

Disclaimer: Tintinologist.org assumes no responsibility for any content you post to the forums/web site. Staff reserve the right to remove any submitted content which they deem in breach of Tintinologist.org's Terms of Use. If you spot anything on Tintinologist.org that you think is inappropriate, please alert the moderation team. Sometimes things slip through, but we will always act swiftly to remove unauthorised material.

Reply

 Forgot password
Please log in to post. No account? Create one!